Adi Sirkes

Adi Sirkes

ASSOCIATE

Education


  • The University of Texas School of Law
    • J.D., with Honors, 2019
    • Associate Editor and Co-Chair of New Member Feedback Committee, Texas Law Review
    • Dean’s Achievement Award, Constitutional Law II: Free Speech
  • Rice University, B.A., Political Science, 2013
    • Intern in the United States Program, French Institute for International Relations
    • Research Assistant, Rice University Sociology Department
    • Minor in Sociology
  • Institut d’Etudes politiques de Paris (Sciences Po Paris), 2012

Judicial Clerkships


  • Judicial Intern, Hon. Debra Lehrmann, Supreme Court of Texas, 2017

Languages


  • Hebrew
  • Korean
  • French

Biography


Adi Sirkes is a born advocate with an innate desire to help others succeed. As a trial attorney at Reynolds Frizzell, he focuses on advising clients across a wide array of industries to protect their legal rights and provide strategic remedies. Adi views each case as a puzzle to solve – delving deep into the facts to find the missing piece of information that can be crucial to a client’s success.

As the son of Israeli immigrants, Adi is enthralled by different cultures and speaks Hebrew, Korean, and French. His unique ability to understand the diverse perspectives of others allows him to develop creative solutions to complex legal issues and serve as a vigilant sounding board.

Adi graduated from The University of Texas School of Law where he served as Associate Editor of the Texas Law Review and interned for Judge Debra Lehrmann of the Texas Supreme Court. Prior to law school, he spent three years teaching English in South Korea where he was appointed as a mentor to new teachers, helping them to prepare for and ace their evaluations. With an adaptive personality that stems from his past experiences, Adi brings valuable perspective to the Reynolds Frizzell team.

Representative Matters


Baker Donelson

Represented Baker Donelson in a legal malpractice suit brought by a litigation funding venture created to fund cases arising out of the Deepwater Horizon incident. When the plaintiff lost some of its claims against its co-venturer in an underlying arbitration, the plaintiff then sued Baker Donelson, claiming that it negligently caused plaintiff’s alleged arbitration losses.  The plaintiff sought $48 million in damages. After securing a pre-trial summary judgment in its favor on various claims, Baker Donelson proceeded to and fully prevailed in a seven-day bench trial in federal court on plaintiff’s remaining claims. The Court issued a take-nothing judgment in favor of Baker Donelson.